Procedures: Institutional Signature FAQ's

Institutional Signature Process for Research Proposals/Applications

 


 

What do the Deans, Chairs and PI signatures signify?

Back to Top

How much time is required by Research Development & Services (RD&S) for institutional signature on proposals/applications?

  • 3-day turnaround time requested; applications are processed as quickly as possible

  • RD&S has only one dedicated person for signature process (approximately 1,800 grant applications are signed per year; with 65% processed through the Pre-Award Grants Facilitator. The Tri-Council applications represent less than 50% of all applications processed)

  • Certain programs may require additional time for review. For example: matching programs or programs that require an inter-institutional commitment

Back to Top

Who is the first contact in RD&S for institutional signature or questions?

  • External grants - Katy Pocock, Pre-Award Grants Facilitator  (katy.pocock@uwo.ca or x80242)

  • Internal grants – Florence Lourdes, Internal Grants Coordinator (flourdes@uwo.ca or x84500)

  • Early contact with Katy or Florence is encouraged, especially if guidelines are unclear

Back to Top

What does the institutional signature mean on the sponsor application and ROLA Proposal?

  • Western’s institutional signature commits Western to the terms and conditions as set out by the Sponsor at the time of application

    • Prior to signature, a full internal review of the application, sponsor guidelines, and any agreements are completed by RD&S

    • All risks and deliverables attributable to grant applications are assessed prior to Western’s signature

    • There are only four authorized Board approved institutional signatories for research grant applications, agreements, and contracts at Western, all of whom have extremely busy schedules and are often not available for last minute signature.

Back to Top

Is the institutional signature required on all applications for research funding?

  • Yes.  Western's institutional signature is required on all research proposals, applications, grants, contracts, letters of intent, etc., even if not directed by the sponsor (see MAAP 7.5 & MAAP 7.8)

Back to Top

What is the requirement for signature if I am a Co-PI on an application?

  • A ROLA Proposal with PI, Chair and Associate Dean Research signatures needs to be processed through to RD&S for approval. This allows RD&S to review the commitments being made in the application.

    • A full copy of the sponsor application (minimally, front signature pages, proposal summary, budget pages and budget justification) is required.

Back to Top

What is the requirement for signature if I have a co-applicant from another institution on my proposal/application?

  • A ROLA Proposal with PI, Chair and Associate Dean Research signatures needs to be processed through to RD&S for approval. This allows RD&S to review the commitments being made in the application.

    • Signatures on Sponsor Application for all required parties (Co-PI & Co-PI Institution) if mandated by Sponsor.

    • A full copy of the sponsor application is required

Back to Top

What if there is no space on the application for institutional signature?

  • Regardless of whether there is a designated location on the form, an authorized institutional signature, and ROLA Proposal is required for all applications for research funding leaving the university (see MAAP 7.5 & MAAP 7.8)

Back to Top

What does RD&S do upon receipt of an application?

  • Actual review time can take anywhere from 15 minutes, or up to several full working days, depending on complexities and the number of internal individuals required to review certain aspects of the application and sponsor guidelines.

  • A review includes:

  •  
    • Guidelines are obtained to ensure complete review of application. Guidelines are often readily available online, but in some cases, guidelines are provided directly to researcher (PI) by sponsor, and RD&S must request these from the Principal Investigator (PI).

      • Guidelines are reviewed for eligibility, Intellectual Property issues, liabilities and warranties, indirect costs, terms and conditions or reference to an Agreement (any Agreement, if available, is also reviewed, as application signatures may commit Western to terms stipulated in an unseen Agreement)

      • Eligibility of researcher to hold a research account at Western is confirmed.

      • If appointment is not yet on HR system, or PI is not eligible, Department and/or Faculty or Faculty Relations must be contacted to complete HR documentation and inclusion in the HR system.

      • Grant application is reviewed to ensure accuracy with respect to guidelines, contact information, budgets, administrative detail

      • Ensure all signatures have been obtained, as required by agency/sponsor.  i.e. co-investigators, partner institutions

      • Confirm ROLA Proposal is submitted, with Chair and ADR signatures. These signatures commit the Department and Faculty to the resources outlined in the research proposal, and provide awareness to the Chair and ADR of the applications being processed for their areas

      • PI is contacted if any comments or concerns

      • Sponsor may be contacted for clarification of guidelines, if necessary, or to assist PI with any questions

      • Route application to the Contracts team for review if industry involvement or contract requirement

Back to Top

Aren’t all application guidelines the same?

  • The variety of applications received in any one day may involve from six to ten different sponsors and/or programs; all of which are governed by separate guidelines. To ensure proper risk management for Western, each application and its governing guidelines must be reviewed. Some guidelines are complex and subject to interpretation.

    • In-house consultation within RD&S may be required before signatures can be finalized.

Back to Top

With the advent of electronic applications shouldn’t the review be quicker?

  • With the current high competition for research dollars, grant applications are submitted to many different sponsors and programs, including the Tri-Council (SSHRC, CIHR and NSERC) and sponsors around the world.  Sponsors using electronic submission processes often require RD&S to be registered and functional as the institution within these electronic systems.  These application and approval systems are becoming more complex to learn, navigate, and effectively administer.  In addition, some of the Sponsors are requiring on-line submission of activity reports which require institutional release and approval through RD&S.

Back to Top

Isn’t RD&S duplicating the review that is conducted in the Department/Faculty?

  • As Chair and ADR review processes vary across campus, RD&S does not presume the level of review provided by any Department or Faculty

    • Chairs and ADR’s are concerned about the commitment of resources and the science of the project; RD&S does work very closely with the Research/Grant Facilitators within the faculties and consultation ensures that work flow is smooth and not duplicated. 

Back to Top

Is there an advantage to provide RD&S with advanced notice of my potential application?

  • Yes, the RD&S contact who reviews applications is also responsible to respond to a high volume of queries from Western’s research community on application and signature processes

    • RD&S encourages early contact which assists in ensuring there are no “surprises” at signature time; Program guidelines can be reviewed, providing the opportunity for discussion on any specific issues or requirements

    • Last minute signature requests are problematic as proper review requires time and required signatures may be missing.  Since the types of  sponsors and applications can vary across campus, there may be major deadlines in certain disciplines of which others are not aware. A last minute application presented may not receive the attention or quick turnaround expected.

Back to Top

What are the common errors found on applications?

  • Common application errors include:

  • Budget errors – adding errors, totals from one page do not match totals on summary pages

  • Inadequate budget justifications, or numbers do not match the budget

  • Missing or incorrect indirect cost recovery (overhead); indirect costs MUST be included at the maximum allowable rate provided within sponsor guidelines

  • Page limitations are exceeded and will be removed by Agency before review

  • Incorrect page numbering

  • Missing or incorrect signatures (Institution signature for Western is ONLY through RD&S)

  • Spelling or grammar errors

  • Incomplete paragraphs or sentences

  • Missing pages or sections of applications

Last minute requests for signatures increase the risk to Western that a critical element may be missed in the review and researchers run the risk that a signatory may not be available, or that the application requires revision prior to signature.

Back to Top



 

Quick Links

ROLA

Forms

Policies

Procedures

Resources

Related Services

Animal Care Vet Services

Research Finance

Research Ethics

Research Park

WORLDiscoveries

Contact Us

5150 Support Services Building
Tel: 519-661-2161
res-serv@uwo.ca

ROLAHelpDesk
519-661-3136
rolahelp@uwo.ca

Also of interest:

Western provides the best student experience among Canada's leading research-intensive universities