• Graduate Programs
  • Guides/Forms
  • Cyclical Program Reviews
  • New program Approvals
  • Expedited Approval
  • Graduate Degree Level Expectations
• Undergraduate Programs
  • Forms
  • Cyclical Program Reviews
  • New Program Reviews
  • Expedited Approvals
• Resources
  • Acronyms
  • Authorities/Governance
  • Definitions and Levels of Approval
  • Overview and Scope
  • Quality Council Audit Process
  • Reports
• Cyclical Reviews

• Home
• Undergraduate Programs
• Cyclical Program Reviews

Cyclical Program Reviews - Undergraduate

The Provost and Vice-President (Academic) supported by the Vice-Provost (Academic Programs & Students) is responsible for Cyclical Program Reviews and for reporting their outcomes to the Quality Council (QC). 

• Schedule of Cyclical Reviews

Principal Components of the Review:

1. Departmental Self Study
2. The Review Committee
3. The On-site Review
4. Evaluation Criteria
5. Institutional Evaluation (from External Consultants' Report to SUPR-U, SCAPA, Senate and Quality Council)
6. Annual Planning Process

Process/Timelines

Accreditation Reviews

Although cyclical program reviews may be scheduled to coincide with accreditation reviews, accreditation reviews will not take the place of cyclical reviews. A cyclical program review will normally be conducted in addition to the accreditation review to ensure full consideration of all aspects of the cyclical review.