New Program Proposal Process and Timelines
Proposals for new programs are developed by the department
Consultations with all partners is carried out and signed off
Proposal is submitted to SUPR-U committee (Form for Proposal of New Programs)
SUPR-U Committee will review to confirm a program is new - then request an External Review
SUPR-U will appoint an Internal Reviewer and the department will provide a list names of proposed External Consultants to the Chair SUPR-U along with dates the department is available for a full day on-site review
External consultants are selected by the Chair of SUPR-U and the Office of the VP(AP&S) and along with the deparmtent will arrange the on-site visit.
The External Consultants will have 2 weeks from their visit to prepare and submit their report to the Chair SUPR-U (External Consultants Report Template)
The Report is sent to the department for a response and the report and response go to the Internal Reviewer or in the case of the Affiliated Colleges to the Academic Dean for a Summary Report (Final Summary Report) to SUPR-U
SUPR-U makes a recommendation to Senate Committee on Academic Policy and Awards (SCAPA )
If approved at SCAPA, it's then on to Senate and Quality Council
Menu
- Undergraduate Programs
- Graduate Programs
- Institutional Quality Assurance Process (IQAP) (.pdf)
- Schedule of Cyclical Reviews (.pdf)
- Overview and Scope
- Authorities/Governance
- Level of Approvals (.pdf)
- Definitions
- Acronyms
- Quality Council Audit Process
- Reports
Search IQAP Site
Contacts
Sandra Thornton Office of the Vice-Provost (Academic Programs and Students) [Registrar]
John Doerksen
Vice-Provost (Academic Programs and Students) [Registrar]
Also of interest:

